(This item is among the 5-10 highlights posted for ISHN members each week from the ISHN Member information service. Click on the web link to join this service and to support ISHN)...
A study reported in the May 2018 issue of Journal of Child and Family Studies describes parents’ views of Father–Child Rough-and-Tumble Play (RTP). "Parent-child play directly influences child development. One aspect of parent-child play that is gaining interest is a form of physical play, ‘rough-and-tumble play’ (RTP), or roughhousing. RTP is most often played by fathers and has been shown to have positive benefits for children.Three conceptual themes characterized parents’ perspectives on RTP: Strength Challenge describes the physicality and inter-personal challenge of the game; Dynamic Bonding describes how parents view RTP as fostering close father-child relationships, confidence and a playful state of mind; the final theme, Context and Caveats, integrates the contended and contingent aspects of RTP perceived to influence the short and long-term effects of this play". Noting that RTP is seen as a good thing in the home, it would be interesting and important to see if this form of play is still allowed in today's schools. Other studies are showing that boys are increasingly alienated by the social environment in schools and are dropping out or not continuing into post-secondary education. As we push RTP out of school playgrounds, do we push boys along with it?
(This item is among the 5-10 highlights posted for ISHN members each week from the ISHN Member information service. Click on the web link to join this service and to support ISHN)...
0 Comments
(An item from the ISHN Member information service) An article in Issue #5, 2013 of Child Development reported on the impact of low expectations or stereotypes of boys and how these affected the performance of boys and girls in school. Since boys are increasingly being marginalized in schools and thus having the health and development expected, the findings of this study are worth considering. This is particularly urgent when we note that most "gender" focused programs are actually aimed at helping girls. The authors report that "Three studies examined the role of stereotype threat in boys' academic underachievement. Study 1 (children aged 4–10, n = 238) showed that girls from age 4 years and boys from age 7 years believed, and thought adults believed, that boys are academically inferior to girls. Study 2 manipulated stereotype threat, informing children aged 7–8 years (n = 162) that boys tend to do worse than girls at school. This manipulation hindered boys' performance on a reading, writing, and math test, but did not affect girls' performance. Study 3 counteracted stereotype threat, informing children aged 6–9 years (n = 184) that boys and girls were expected to perform similarly. This improved the performance of boys and did not affect that of girls." Read more>>
An item from ISHN Member information service) Boys are not doing well in schools in many countries these days and part of the reason is the removal of social practices and norms that motivate males. One of these rituals in many societies has been an explicit rite of passage into manhood. An article in Issue #4, 2012 of Pastoral Care in Education reports on the re-introduction of a "rites of passage program" into an all-boys school in New Zealand (all-boy schools may also be part of the solution for some boys). The authors report that "xperiences of staff and students involved in the programme are reported using their own words as far as possible. Of particular note is the impact of the programme on the teacher–student relationship. The study raises some significant points for consideration, applicable beyond the specific programme discussed and relevant to all schools concerned about supporting boys. Read more.
|
Welcome to our
|